Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
One thing you're missing here: Craigslist started charging for the Adult Services section at the request of previous Attorneys General with the idea that adding a charge that required a credit card would curtail the use of the section for illegal activities.
http://www.scattorneygeneral.com/newsroom/pdf/2009/craigslist.pdf
Posted by: Collin |
September 8, 2010 6:04 PMAh! Makes sense. Updating the post. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
Posted by: Adrianne Jeffries |
September 8, 2010 6:14 PMI'm baffled as to why craigslist didn't see the profit issue ahead of time. I'm 100% behind them, but raking in millions just doesn't look good, and makes them an easy target. From day one of charging for Adult Services, they should have been giving 100% of that money to organizations that work to prevent sex trafficking and child prostitution, to make it 100% clear that the money was for filtering, not for profit.
Posted by: Brad Weikel |
September 8, 2010 6:17 PMI think this is a good thing to do for Craiglist. But I bet that some thousands or maybe millions of dollars will be taken out from earnings in the industry with Craiglist ready to censor. LOL. Thanks for the info.
Posted by: WebHosting Guru |
September 8, 2010 7:09 PMI'm baffled how an article on ReadWriteWeb could miss the obvious question of free speech on the internet.
What you have here is public officials (facing re-election) using their office as a pulpit, making legal threats they know to be unenforceable, and lying to the media in order to prohibit speech which they know to be legal. State AGs are literally using a public relations campaign to circumvent an Act of Congress intended to curtail their power against just *this* kind of electioneering. That the AGs happen to be exploiting victimized children in their media campaign is almost incidental to the larger attack on the law and Constitution.
The Communications Decency Act protects electronic publishers from liability for content produced by users of the system. Absent that immunity there could be no Google, no Blogspot, no Facebook, no WordPress.com, no Digg or Reddit, no Twitter and no comments (like this one) on ReadWriteWeb.
The moralistic campaigns against 4chan and craigslist all lead to one inevitable conclusion: the publishers of ReadWriteWeb will be criminally and civilly liable for the comments of this community.
Here's a concept that's new: Has anyone ever substantiated the claims that Craigslist has ever been used for child or human trafficking? Is there even one demonstrable case of this occurring? If not, then the site may have just established millions of dollars in damages for a defamation suit against it's detractors. Yes, Craigslist is a public person, that doesn't mean they can't be defamed: they just have to prove damages.
Posted by: Baffled |
September 8, 2010 10:04 PMMobile phone carriers should be banned to provide a phone number to prostitutes as they are also making tons of money from an illegale activity.
Same thing for people selling cloth, sex toys, etc.
Posted by: idont |
September 9, 2010 9:21 AMOne thing you're missing here: Craigslist started charging for the Adult Services section at the request of previous Attorneys General with the idea that adding a charge that required a credit card would curtail the use of the section for illegal activities.
http://www.scattorneygeneral.com/newsroom/pdf/2009/craigslist.pdf
Posted by: Collin |
September 8, 2010 6:04 PMAh! Makes sense. Updating the post. Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
Posted by: Adrianne Jeffries |
September 8, 2010 6:14 PMI'm baffled as to why craigslist didn't see the profit issue ahead of time. I'm 100% behind them, but raking in millions just doesn't look good, and makes them an easy target. From day one of charging for Adult Services, they should have been giving 100% of that money to organizations that work to prevent sex trafficking and child prostitution, to make it 100% clear that the money was for filtering, not for profit.
Posted by: Brad Weikel |
September 8, 2010 6:17 PMI think this is a good thing to do for Craiglist. But I bet that some thousands or maybe millions of dollars will be taken out from earnings in the industry with Craiglist ready to censor. LOL. Thanks for the info.
Posted by: WebHosting Guru |
September 8, 2010 7:09 PMI'm baffled how an article on ReadWriteWeb could miss the obvious question of free speech on the internet.
What you have here is public officials (facing re-election) using their office as a pulpit, making legal threats they know to be unenforceable, and lying to the media in order to prohibit speech which they know to be legal. State AGs are literally using a public relations campaign to circumvent an Act of Congress intended to curtail their power against just *this* kind of electioneering. That the AGs happen to be exploiting victimized children in their media campaign is almost incidental to the larger attack on the law and Constitution.
The Communications Decency Act protects electronic publishers from liability for content produced by users of the system. Absent that immunity there could be no Google, no Blogspot, no Facebook, no WordPress.com, no Digg or Reddit, no Twitter and no comments (like this one) on ReadWriteWeb.
The moralistic campaigns against 4chan and craigslist all lead to one inevitable conclusion: the publishers of ReadWriteWeb will be criminally and civilly liable for the comments of this community.
Here's a concept that's new: Has anyone ever substantiated the claims that Craigslist has ever been used for child or human trafficking? Is there even one demonstrable case of this occurring? If not, then the site may have just established millions of dollars in damages for a defamation suit against it's detractors. Yes, Craigslist is a public person, that doesn't mean they can't be defamed: they just have to prove damages.
Posted by: Baffled |
September 8, 2010 10:04 PMMobile phone carriers should be banned to provide a phone number to prostitutes as they are also making tons of money from an illegale activity.
Same thing for people selling cloth, sex toys, etc.
Posted by: idont |
September 9, 2010 9:21 AM
Microsoft, we thought you learned your lesson from the from the failure of Bing Cashback. It looks like we were wrong.
Earlier today, Microsoft launched Bing Rewards, a new program that lets users earn credits for performing actions like searching on
Of course, there’s a catch — you have to download the “Bing Bar” (it’s a toolbar for
Overall, Bing Rewards is exactly like any loyalty rewards program you’ve used via your credit card or at your favorite store. Buy more stuff and complete certain tasks, and you get some miniscule reward. The program is clearly the successor to Bing Cashback, the now-defunct rewards program that gave you money for buying products through the Bing search engine. Cashback’s termination was announced in June, and it officially closed on July 30.
We were hoping that Cashback would be the end of Microsoft trying to (directly) buy users, but it looks like that was hoping for too much. While the program seems like a decent enough concept, we just don’t think people treat search like they do their credit cards. Are thousands or millions of people really going to switch from
Microsoft, you’re wasting time, energy and resources on this rewards program. Awesome new features are going to help you win the search war, not Bing points and gift cards.
Disclosure: Microsoft is a
For more Tech coverage:
THE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Good <b>News</b>! Microsoft's Killing More Side <b>...</b>
It shouldn't be sweating things like Zune, and even search to some degree.
Small Business <b>News</b>: The White Paper Overview
Pundits still say they are a great way to develop credibility for your business easy to distribute in their popular current PDF format and also, if done right,
<b>News</b> Roundup: Ryan Murphy Confirms Chord Overstreet Will Not Play <b>...</b>
Ryan Murphy finally put an end to the speculation about Kurt's new boyfriend on 'Glee' -- well, sort of. We finally know once and for all.
bench craft company rip off
bench craft company rip off
THE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Good <b>News</b>! Microsoft's Killing More Side <b>...</b>
It shouldn't be sweating things like Zune, and even search to some degree.
Small Business <b>News</b>: The White Paper Overview
Pundits still say they are a great way to develop credibility for your business easy to distribute in their popular current PDF format and also, if done right,
<b>News</b> Roundup: Ryan Murphy Confirms Chord Overstreet Will Not Play <b>...</b>
Ryan Murphy finally put an end to the speculation about Kurt's new boyfriend on 'Glee' -- well, sort of. We finally know once and for all.
bench craft company rip off bench craft company rip off
Comments
Subscribe to comments for this post OR Subscribe to comments for all ReadWriteWeb posts
Microsoft, we thought you learned your lesson from the from the failure of Bing Cashback. It looks like we were wrong.
Earlier today, Microsoft launched Bing Rewards, a new program that lets users earn credits for performing actions like searching on
Of course, there’s a catch — you have to download the “Bing Bar” (it’s a toolbar for
Overall, Bing Rewards is exactly like any loyalty rewards program you’ve used via your credit card or at your favorite store. Buy more stuff and complete certain tasks, and you get some miniscule reward. The program is clearly the successor to Bing Cashback, the now-defunct rewards program that gave you money for buying products through the Bing search engine. Cashback’s termination was announced in June, and it officially closed on July 30.
We were hoping that Cashback would be the end of Microsoft trying to (directly) buy users, but it looks like that was hoping for too much. While the program seems like a decent enough concept, we just don’t think people treat search like they do their credit cards. Are thousands or millions of people really going to switch from
Microsoft, you’re wasting time, energy and resources on this rewards program. Awesome new features are going to help you win the search war, not Bing points and gift cards.
Disclosure: Microsoft is a
For more Tech coverage:
bench craft company rip off
THE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Good <b>News</b>! Microsoft's Killing More Side <b>...</b>
It shouldn't be sweating things like Zune, and even search to some degree.
Small Business <b>News</b>: The White Paper Overview
Pundits still say they are a great way to develop credibility for your business easy to distribute in their popular current PDF format and also, if done right,
<b>News</b> Roundup: Ryan Murphy Confirms Chord Overstreet Will Not Play <b>...</b>
Ryan Murphy finally put an end to the speculation about Kurt's new boyfriend on 'Glee' -- well, sort of. We finally know once and for all.
bench craft company rip off bench craft company rip off
THE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Good <b>News</b>! Microsoft's Killing More Side <b>...</b>
It shouldn't be sweating things like Zune, and even search to some degree.
Small Business <b>News</b>: The White Paper Overview
Pundits still say they are a great way to develop credibility for your business easy to distribute in their popular current PDF format and also, if done right,
<b>News</b> Roundup: Ryan Murphy Confirms Chord Overstreet Will Not Play <b>...</b>
Ryan Murphy finally put an end to the speculation about Kurt's new boyfriend on 'Glee' -- well, sort of. We finally know once and for all.
bench craft company rip off bench craft company rip off
THE MICROSOFT INVESTOR: Good <b>News</b>! Microsoft's Killing More Side <b>...</b>
It shouldn't be sweating things like Zune, and even search to some degree.
Small Business <b>News</b>: The White Paper Overview
Pundits still say they are a great way to develop credibility for your business easy to distribute in their popular current PDF format and also, if done right,
<b>News</b> Roundup: Ryan Murphy Confirms Chord Overstreet Will Not Play <b>...</b>
Ryan Murphy finally put an end to the speculation about Kurt's new boyfriend on 'Glee' -- well, sort of. We finally know once and for all.
bench craft company rip off
No comments:
Post a Comment